sg
Select Country
Search Icon
close icon
ARCHIFYNOW > THOUGHT LEADERSHIP > Built For the Sun Regionals Retrofit Revolution

Built For the Sun: Regional’s Retrofit Revolution

BY
fb icon
wa icon
email icon

Dr Stephen Poon is a social creative catalyst whose distinctive worldview has been shaped by extensive academic and professional experiences across Europe. His multicultural background informs a versatile perspective and a long-standing commitment to innovation, sustainability, and social transformation. Actively engaged in research, he has contributed to scholarly journals, book chapters, and magazines, addressing contemporary issues in Climate Governance in Smart Cities, including paradigms, redesign, enterprise development, strategic frameworks, and systemic approaches. His work also explores Circularity and Sustainability in Context, as well as Urban Studies, with particular emphasis on the dynamic interplay between cities, economies, and media systems. Drawing on these areas of expertise, he authored the article “Built for the Sun: Regional Retrofit Revolution”, which examines sustainable design and adaptive reuse through the case study of Rumah Turi Eco Hotel, Indonesia’s pioneering eco-green hotel.

Introduction

Climate change is widening the comfort gap in buildings, and the tropics feel it first and longest: higher wet‑bulb temperatures, urban heat islands, and strained water and energy systems push everyday spaces to their limits. Sustainable design, design that minimises resource use and toxicity across a building’s life while enhancing human comfort, offers a practical counterweight by pairing careful siting and form with material frugality and climate‑responsive operation (Moxon, 2012). In Indonesia, where rapid urbanisation and economic growth raise energy demand, climate‑attuned design is not a luxury; it is a public‑health and infrastructure strategy that can reduce cooling loads, protect indoor air quality, and make neighbourhoods more resilient to heat and flood (Nurdiani and Zahran, 2025; Cairns Regional Council, 2011). The core idea is simple: let the building work with the local sun, wind, and rain before calling on machines. That means orienting for breezes, shading for solar control, capturing daylight without glare, and selecting materials with low embodied energy that will endure in hot‑humid conditions (Green Passive Solar, 2014; Kadi, 2021). Policy and market trends in Indonesia, Greenship certification and emerging value recognition for green features, are beginning to support this shift (GBC Indonesia, 2014; Sidig et al., 2025).

At the same time, Indonesia’s climate sets clear hurdles. High humidity drives mould and discomfort, solar gain pushes indoor temperatures upward, and biological agents, termites, fungi, UV degradation, challenge finishes and assemblies. Poorly chosen heavy materials can trap daytime heat into the night; untreated timber can decay; and sealed, mechanically cooled envelopes often deliver stale air and high energy bills. The remedy is targeted, climate‑sensitive design: cross‑ventilation and stack‑effect paths to move moisture‑laden air; deep overhangs, screens, and vegetation to shade façades and courtyards; robust details and finishes that resist damp and pests; and envelopes calibrated so thermal mass is shaded and night‑flushed rather than sun‑soaked (Cairns Regional Council, 2011; Kadi, 2021; Green Passive Solar, 2014). Renovation adds another lever: retrofits can deliver faster carbon savings than rebuilds, especially when they combine passive upgrades with efficient systems and water reuse (Alexakis et al., 2025; Devira and Fitri, 2024). This essay argues that integrating passive and sustainable strategies, guided by lessons from vernacular architecture and tested by contemporary projects, can simultaneously improve liveability and reduce environmental impacts in Indonesia’s tropical context (Petrucci, 2023; Anisa et al., 2024).

Sustainable Design Affection for The Environment

Buildings are among the largest users of energy and materials, and in hot‑humid cities their cooling demand and water use compound that footprint. Every design decision, how a plan breathes, where a window lands, what a floor is made of, either amplifies or eases those impacts. Designers sit at the point of maximum leverage. Through material selection, they can cut embodied energy by favouring reclaimed timber, recycled aggregates, and low‑toxicity finishes, and by avoiding high‑impact tropical hardwoods and short‑lived composites that decay in damp conditions (Moxon, 2012). Through appliance and fixture choices, they can shrink operational loads via efficient lighting and water‑saving devices that perform reliably in humid environments (Cairns Regional Council, 2011). Crucially, they can treat existing buildings as carbon banks: rather than raze and rebuild, they can retrofit envelopes for shading and ventilation, seal air leaks, add radiant barriers where appropriate, and pair these passive moves with efficient fans and right‑sized equipment. Evidence from climate‑sensitive retrofit studies shows that in warm zones, passive upgrades and HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) optimisation dominate the most effective interventions; they are fast, scalable, and cost‑effective compared with full replacement (Alexakis et al., 2025). Indonesia’s market is starting to recognize these gains. Appraisers, developers, and tenants increasingly value green features that reduce operating costs and enhance indoor environmental quality, though enforcement gaps and uneven expertise still slow adoption (Sidig et al., 2025). The cumulative environmental benefit is twofold: lower energy and water use during operation and lower embodied emissions upfront by reusing what already exists.

Sustainable design also shapes the air we breathe. Good passive design in the tropics is first and foremost moisture management: air must move, interior surfaces must dry, and sun must be tamed without turning rooms into caves. Cross‑ventilation paths aligned with prevailing breezes, high‑level exhausts to purge heat, and shaded outdoor‑indoor thresholds keep relative humidity in check and push contaminants outside (Cairns Regional Council, 2011; Kadi, 2021). Material choices matter here, too. Low‑VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) finishes and natural materials such as bamboo or properly treated local timber reduce off‑gassing, while their lower embodied energy trims the project’s carbon footprint (Moxon, 2012). Real projects in Indonesia show how these choices add up. In simple houses, residents report measurable comfort improvements from canopies that shade façades, larger operable openings, and front‑back open spaces that cool the microclimate, without resorting to heavy‑duty air‑conditioning (Anisa et al., 2024). In low‑income housing prototypes, careful orientation, building form, and opening design can even out air speeds and temperatures across rooms, delivering both energy savings and healthier indoor air (Wijaksono, 2024). The environmental dividend extends beyond the meter: vegetated courtyards capture rain and cool evening breezes; reclaimed brick and tile reduce landfill; and maintenance cycles stretch when finishes are chosen for UV (ultraviolet) and moisture resistance in tropical exposure (Cairns Regional Council, 2011; Moxon, 2012). Put simply, sustainable design weaves efficiency with well‑being, it reduces embodied and operational energy, protects indoor air, conserves water, and preserves natural resources, while making spaces that people actually enjoy.

Building In Tropical Climate

Hot‑humid climates present a stubborn chemistry: high ambient moisture limits evaporative cooling, intense solar radiation heats façades and roofs, and nights often fail to shed accumulated heat. Add pests, fungal growth, and UV degradation of finishes, and many conventional building recipes quickly unravel. The result is familiar, mouldy corners, peeling coatings, musty rooms, and a reliance on air‑conditioners that dehumidify poorly and cost a fortune. Good tropical design begins by acknowledging those forces and bending the building around them. Orientation matters: long façades should face the gentler sun paths, with deep overhangs and vertical screens guarding east‑west exposures; main openings should align with prevailing breezes to pull air through; interior volumes should rise to allow stack‑driven exhaust through high vents or ridge openings; and shaded outdoor rooms should mediate between garden and interior to cool incoming air (Cairns Regional Council, 2011; Kadi, 2021). Material selection must follow climate logic. Dense materials can be helpful when shaded and night‑flushed, but disastrous when sun‑struck; untreated timbers invite termites; and film‑forming coatings fail under UV and condensation. The safer palette in many Indonesian settings is a mix of shaded thermal mass, breathable assemblies, and durable, repairable finishes that tolerate wet‑dry cycles (Green Passive Solar, 2014; Moxon, 2012). Landscape is not decoration, it is equipment. Trees and vines cast moving shade, cool air through evapotranspiration, and protect walls; permeable ground cools the air that enters at floor level; and water features can be designed to aerate without adding humidity to interiors (Cairns Regional Council, 2011).

Crucially, low‑cost buildings can be dry, cool, and comfortable when sited and shaped correctly. Vernacular Indonesian houses prove this daily: high ceilings, open floor plans, and generous eaves create fast‑flushing interiors and shaded thresholds that stay habitable across seasons (Petrucci, 2023). Fieldwork in simple houses shows that residents perceive real benefits from canopies and properly sized openings, because these elements lower wall temperatures and allow night purging (Anisa et al., 2024). Microclimates also count. A breezy corner lot behaves differently from a wind‑shadowed courtyard; streets with tall, close buildings trap heat; and coastal humidity behaves differently from upland air. Designing with local wind roses, neighbourhood shading, and seasonal rain patterns is therefore a baseline competency, not an add‑on (Kadi, 2021; Cairns Regional Council, 2011). For multi‑family or budget housing, studies demonstrate that careful arrangement of blocks and cross‑ventilation strategies can deliver even airflow and reduce reliance on mechanical cooling, vital where energy poverty and health risks intersect (Wijaksono, 2024). The lesson is pragmatic: when the building works like a lung and a hat, breathing out heat and moisture while shading itself, materials last longer, interiors stay healthier, and energy demand falls.

Traditional House in Indonesia

Traditional Indonesian houses are living textbooks of low‑tech sustainability (Figure 1). Built from bamboo, timber, and other local materials, they minimise embodied energy and allow for repair rather than replacement. Their passive cooling repertoire is sophisticated: high ceilings collect hot air, floor‑level and high‑level openings set up cross‑ and stack‑ventilation, and deep overhangs and verandas shade walls and people alike (Moxon, 2012). Many are raised on stilts, which not only avoid damp ground air and pests but also create shaded, ventilated spaces beneath. Vegetation is integral, not ornamental: fruit trees, vines, and courtyards shape wind and light, casting seasonal shade while admitting winter sun where climates vary. In Javanese houses, the high‑roofed pendopo and pringgitan spaces choreograph airflow and social life together; the result is comfort without compressors, driven by geometry, section, and simple materials (Nardiati et al., 2023; Petrucci, 2023). Privacy frameworks, zoned thresholds, layered entries, and graded heights, show how cultural values and environmental performance can align, with screened edges that both respect social norms and filter glare and heat (Hasan et al., 2021). Ethnomathematical readings of the Madurese Tanean‑Lanjang compound underline how proportion, spacing, and orientation embed climate sense in settlement form, from courtyard dimensions that ventilate to roof pitches that shed rain efficiently (Sari et al., 2022).

Built For the Sun: Regional’s Retrofit Revolution

Figure 1. Traditional Indonesia house

These lessons translate cleanly to contemporary practice. Stack‑ventilated atria, shaded galleries, operable louvers, and vegetated façades echo vernacular tactics while meeting modern programmes. The Suwawa Payango tradition, craft knowledge passed across generations, reminds designers that structural logic, joinery, and siting emerge from patient observation of climate and materials; such knowledge is not nostalgic, it is performance data (Umar et al., 2023). As modernisation erodes familiarity with these patterns, their environmental value becomes easier to overlook (Nardiati et al., 2023). Reframing tradition as a repository of tested passive strategies helps bridge culture and sustainability: using bamboo with engineered joints, specifying locally durable timbers with proper detailing, or arranging plans to create pressure differentials for ventilation are not aesthetic gestures but climate devices. Moxon’s argument, that comfort can be achieved through form, section, and surface before technology, fits these houses exactly, and provides a design ethic for new tropical work: start with climate, scale up with culture, and use machines sparingly (Petrucci, 2023).

Green Building in Indonesia

Indonesia’s green‑building movement has momentum but faces friction. On the positive side, GBC Indonesia’s Greenship rating tool has localized international best practice, created training pipelines, and provided a common language for energy and water efficiency, materials, site ecology, and indoor environmental quality (GBC Indonesia, 2014). On the market side, recent evidence from Jakarta indicates that appraisers and developers increasingly perceive value in certified or high‑performance buildings, citing lower operating costs, healthier environments, and improved tenant appeal (Sidig et al., 2025). Yet policy enforcement remains uneven, market data are patchy, and capacity varies widely among project teams, especially outside major urban centres (Sidig et al., 2025). Government regulation is moving, with energy and water efficiency requirements for large buildings in metropolitan areas, but compliance pathways and monitoring still need tightening to translate policy into kilowatt‑hour and litter savings at scale (GBC Indonesia, 2014). Meanwhile, rapid growth continues to drive construction, making it urgent to embed passive design and low‑carbon materials into mainstream procurement rather than treating them as boutique options (Nurdiani and Zahran, 2025).

Built For the Sun: Regional’s Retrofit Revolution

Figure 2. BCA Tower in Central Jakarta

Collaboration is the hinge. Architects and interior designers specify the siting, openings, and finishes that determine loads; engineers right‑size and integrate efficient systems; developers and owners commit to life‑cycle cost thinking; and agencies align permitting and incentives with verified performance outcomes. Real buildings, like the BCA (Bank Central Asia) tower on Jl. MH Thamrin (Figure 2) and Sampoerna Strategic Square on Jl. Jend. Sudirman (Figure 3), have been cited locally as early compliance examples, and they illustrate how large Jakarta assets can move first, signal expectations, and create supply‑chain capacity for efficient equipment, water reuse, and better envelopes. Public projects and community facilities provide another front: youth centres, offices, and housing prototypes that combine shaded façades, natural ventilation, solar power, and rainwater harvesting demonstrate that climate‑responsive design is compatible with Indonesian construction culture and budgets (Devira and Fitri, 2024; Nurdiani and Zahran, 2025; Wijaksono, 2024). If barriers of enforcement, training, and finance are addressed, Indonesia’s abundant resources, bamboo, timber, sun, and rain, position the country to lead in green construction regionally, with Greenship serving as a policy‑market bridge and retrofit programs delivering near‑term emissions cuts (GBC Indonesia, 2014; Alexakis et al., 2025; Sidig et al., 2025).

Built For the Sun: Regional’s Retrofit Revolution

Figure 3. Sampoerna Strategic Square (North Tower)

Rumah Turi The First Eco-Green Hotel in Indonesia

Rumah Turi in Solo offers a grounded playbook for eco‑friendly renovation in the tropics (Figure 4). Rather than building anew, the project adaptively reused an existing house, repurposing roof elements and deploying broken bricks and tiles as expressive wall cladding, a move that avoided paint, reduced maintenance, and cut embodied energy (Dora, 2014; Moxon, 2012). Interiors lean on daylight and vegetation: big sliding glass doors open to gardens, overhangs and bamboo screens temper sun, and vertical greenery wraps corridors and rooftops to cool air and filter dust before it enters rooms (Dora, 2014). Cross‑ventilation and stack paths are legible in section and plan, allowing the restaurant to operate with natural ventilation much of the time. Where artificial light is needed, low‑wattage LEDs trim loads. The project treats landscape as climate hardware: trees and planted courtyards create microclimates that cool and calm, while permeable pavements with biopori holes recharge groundwater and limit runoff. In materials, the hotel doubles down on reuse, from furniture built with recycled timber to doors salvaged from buildings damaged in the 2006 Bantul earthquake, choices that keep cultural memory alive as they cut waste (Dora, 2014; Moxon, 2012).

Water is handled with equal care. A biofill sanitation system processes greywater and wastewater using layered natural media, fibre, sand, and gravel, before it is directed to a tank and then to a small waterfall feature that both aerates the water and cools the courtyard microclimate (Dora, 2014). This integration of infrastructure and place is the project’s quiet lesson: systems can be visible, didactic, and beautiful. The indoor environmental quality benefits are obvious, brighter spaces with less glare, fresher air with fewer pollutants, and acoustically softer environments thanks to plants and porous materials. Just as important, every move is reproducible with local skills and supply chains: bricks, reclaimed timber, bamboo, LED lamps, gravel filters, and planted trellises are available across Indonesian cities and towns. Rumah Turi proves that green renovation in the tropics is not a high‑tech gamble but a sequence of disciplined, low‑tech choices that add up to meaningful reductions in energy and water use and measurable gains in comfort and character (Dora, 2014; Cairns Regional Council, 2011).

Built For the Sun: Regional’s Retrofit Revolution

Figure 4. Rumah Turi room, Green Boutique Hotel

Passive Design Element

Passive design uses the building’s form, orientation, openings, and envelope to harvest breeze and shade while controlling heat and moisture. In Indonesia’s climate, its jobs are to block solar gain, purge indoor heat and humidity, draw daylight without glare, and keep materials dry. Orientation sets the stage: minimise east‑west exposure, place the longest sides south‑north where feasible, and align major openings to prevailing winds. Shading follows as deep eaves, verandas, fins, and vegetation protect glass and walls, while courtyards cool incoming air. Ventilation is the engine. Cross‑ventilation moves air laterally; stack ventilation leverages hot air’s buoyancy to pull fresh air through low openings and exhaust it high (Figure 5). Thermal mass helps when shaded and night‑flushed, dense floors or walls store coolness and damp heat swings, but in the tropics, it must be kept out of direct sun to avoid re‑radiating heat after dark (Green Passive Solar, 2014; Moxon, 2012). Where radiant barriers or light‑coloured roofs reduce solar absorption, insulation slows heat transfer through the envelope; used judiciously with ventilation paths, it can smooth diurnal swings without trapping moisture (Cairns Regional Council, 2011; Kadi, 2021). Daylighting strategies, higher windows, clerestories, and reflective interior surfaces, cut electric lighting demand while preserving visual comfort (Cairns Regional Council, 2011). These are low‑cost, high‑impact moves: they rely on geometry and detailing more than gadgets, and they play well with Indonesian construction practices (Wijaksono, 2024).

Built For the Sun: Regional’s Retrofit Revolution

Figure 5. Passive Ventilation

Air enters from a shaded, cooler side, passes through an open plan, and exits high or on the leeward façade, flushing heat and moisture. Aligning openings with wind roses and keeping interior partitions permeable boosts effectiveness (Cairns Regional Council, 2011; Kadi, 2021).

Built For the Sun: Regional’s Retrofit Revolution

Figure 6. Roof Ventilation

Solar‑heated air rises to ridge vents; shaded low inlets admit cooler air (Figure 6). With radiant barriers or light roofs, this stack effect reduces ceiling‑level heat reservoirs and improves comfort without compressors (Cairns Regional Council, 2011; Moxon, 2012). In practice, Indonesian projects combine these devices with vegetated shade, rainwater harvesting, and modest PV (photovoltaic) or hybrid cooling to further trim loads (Devira and Fitri, 2024; Nurdiani and Zahran, 2025). The environmental payoff is direct: less electricity for cooling, lower peak demand, reduced carbon emissions, drier materials that last longer, and brighter interiors that need fewer lamps (Green Passive Solar, 2014; Wijaksono, 2024).

Conclusion

Tropical countries face a specific design physics, high humidity, strong sun, persistent heat, that can trap buildings in a cycle of discomfort and high energy use. The way out is not mysterious: integrate passive design and sustainable practices so that buildings breathe, shade, and shed heat before machinery steps in. Lessons from Indonesian tradition, high roofs, shaded galleries, permeable plans, and planted edges, pair naturally with contemporary retrofit and certification frameworks to produce spaces that are healthier for people and lighter on the grid (Moxon, 2012; Petrucci, 2023; GBC Indonesia, 2014). Case evidence from simple homes, low‑income housing prototypes, and projects like Rumah Turi shows that these strategies are replicable and affordable when design leads with climate and materials are chosen for durability and low embodied energy (Dora, 2014; Anisa et al., 2024; Wijaksono, 2024). Carrying this forward requires shared work. Designers must make climate‑first planning routine; policymakers must align codes and incentives with measurable performance; developers must look at life‑cycle costs rather than first cost alone; communities must value and help maintain the vegetated, breathable edges that make neighbourhoods cooler. Indonesia is well placed to lead, it has rich vernacular precedents, abundant renewable resources, and a maturing green‑building ecosystem that is beginning to reward sustainable performance (Sidig et al., 2025; GBC Indonesia, 2014). Sustainable design in the tropics is not a trend; it is a public‑health and climate‑resilience imperative. Buildings that shade, ventilate, and reuse wisely do more than save kilowatt‑hours: they protect well‑being, conserve water, preserve materials, and anchor a fairer, lower‑carbon urban future in Indonesia and across the wider Global South (Alexakis et al., 2025; Cairns Regional Council, 2011).

Works Cited:

Alexakis, Konstantinos, Sophia Komninou, Panagiotis Kokkinakos and Dimitris Askounis. “Climate-sensitive building renovation strategies: A review of retrofit interventions across climatic and building typologies.” Sustainability 17, no.18 (2025): 8187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188187

Anisa, Anisa, Jundi Jundullah Afgani and Finta Lissimia. “Residents' perceptions of passive design responding to climate change in simple houses in Depok, West Java, Indonesia.” Sustainability Science and Resources 6, (2024): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.55168/ssr2809-6029.2024.6001

Cairns Regional Council. Imagine tomorrow – Your community plan 2011–2031, 2011. https://www.cairns.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/39478/separate_attachment_cl3_19oct11.pdf

Devira, Shina and Isnen Fitri. “The design strategy for youth center in Medan using combination of green building and contemporary tropical architectural concept.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol.1404, No.1 (2024, October): 012021. IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1404/1/012021/meta

Dora, Purnama Esa. Rumah Turi, the first eco-green hotel in Indonesia, 2014. https://repository.petra.ac.id/16529/2/Publikasi2_11001_1176.pdf

GBC Indonesia. Green Building Council Indonesia – Home, 2014. http://www.gbcindonesia.org/

Green Passive Solar. Thermal mass | Green Passive Solar Magazine, 2014. http://greenpassivesolar.com/passive-solar/building-characteristics/thermal-mass/

Hasan, Muhammad Ismail, Bintang Noor Prabowo and Hazrina Haja Bava Mohidin. “An architectural review of privacy value in traditional Indonesian housings: Framework of locality-based on Islamic architecture design.” Journal of Design and Built Environment, 21, no.1 (2021): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol21no1.3

Kadi, Bodour. “Design strategies for energy efficient and climate responsive building: Case of hot humid climate’s library building.” Master dissertation, Bahcesehir University, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bodour-Kadi-2/publication/353760799

Moxon, Siân. (2012). Sustainability in interior design, Laurence King Publishing, 2012. https://archive.org/details/sustainabilityin0000moxo

Nardiati, Sri, Mukhammad Isnaenib, Sahid Teguh Widodoc, Sumadid, Menuk Hardaniwatie, Dyah Susilawatif, Sri Winartig, Suyamih, JoniEndardii and Achril Zalmansyah. “Cultural and philosophical meaning of Javanese traditional houses: A case study in Yogyakarta and Surakarta, Indonesia.” Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 9, no.2 (2023): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.902001

Nurdiani, Nina and Ahmad K. Zahran. “The implementation of tropical architecture in office building for supporting sustainable environment.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science Vol.1488, No.1 (2025, April): 012087. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1488/1/012087

Petrucci, Cecilia. Thermal comfort in traditional and sustainable buildings: Comparative analysis of thermal perception in the Middle East and Southeast Asian buildings, 2023. https://unitesi.unive.it/handle/20.500.14247/13957

Sari, Kartika Sari, Mega Teguh Budiarto and Rooselyna Ekawati. “Ethnomathematics study: Cultural values and geometric concepts in the traditional “tanean-lanjang” house in Madura, Indonesia.” JRAMathEdu – Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, (2022): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i1.15660

Sidig, Danar Sutopo, Citra Wulan Ratri and Guntur Arie Wibowo. “What is the value of green building features? An empirical analysis of green building development in Jakarta, Indonesia.” Journal of Property Investment & Finance 43, no.2 (2025): 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-10-2023-0089

Umar, Afifah Harisah, Moh. Mochsen Sir and Abdul Mufti Radja. Application of the concept Payango in the ethnic traditional houses of Suwawa in the Bone Bolango District, Indonesia, 2023. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/39889/

Wijaksono, Sigit. Passive designs of low-income housing with natural ventilation in tropical region. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science Vol.1324, No.1 (2024, April): 012051. IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012051/meta


fb icon
wa icon
email icon
Archifynow
blog platform
ArchifyNow is an online design media that focuses on bringing quality updates of architecture and interior design in Indonesia and Asia Pacific. ArchifyNow curates worthwhile design stories that is expected to enrich the practice of design professionals while introducing applicable design tips and ideas to the public.
More from archifynow
close icon